Someone wrote in [personal profile] fantasticbeasts_kinkmeme 2016-12-25 09:58 am (UTC)

Wizards' thoughts on bestiality

The question posed by the Firenze/Newt subject line got me thinking--how to define bestiality in the magical world? I remember the original FBAWTFT book had an entire section about how one defines "beasts", but is that the only criteria for something being considered bestiality? Is having sex with a non-human being that isn't classified as a beast still bestiality? Is having sex with a transformed werewolf (don't know why you'd want to do that but still) bestiality? What about an animagus? The possibilities are endless.

So! I'd like to see something where Newt somehow gets involved in a conversation in which other wizards are trying to define the exact parameters of magical bestiality, and gets really into it and enthusiastic about the debate. Maybe the topic comes up in conversation as a joke or a thought exercise, and Newt takes it to be an honest discussion and is entirely sincere about it. Maybe there's a piece of his book that was edited out because he addressed the question with inappropriate frankness and thoroughness.

Post a comment in response:

Identity URL: 
Account name:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.


If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at

Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.